Re: [ga] Re: [council] Collisions in Namespace

[Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.nl>]

My support for this too.

Marc Schneiders

On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, at 23:15 [=GMT-0400], Milton Mueller wrote:

> The problem of alternate or competing roots is a highly complex one. I would support the idea of a new, open Working Group being convened on this topic. I say this fully understanding that the debate on this topic often takes the form of a religious war and that it is unlikely that any coherent policy would come out of such a working group soon. 
> 
> However, there is some possibility that, given enough time and some clear guidance, such a group might achieve some consensus points that could bring about a temporary ceasefire, if not an end, to the war. And I see little downside. At worst, the group will waste bandwidth and time and accomplish nothing. At best, it might come up with some useful ideas. Why not give it a try? The incremental cost of a new mailing list is pretty low.
> 
>  
> 
> >>> "babybows.com" <webmaster@babybows.com> 04/12/01 17:26 PM >>>
> "Constituencies or GA participants may propose that
> the NC consider domain name policies or
> recommendations."
> 
> As two principles addressed by the White Paper, stability and competition,
> have been raised in the course of this debate, and whereas the Department of
> Commerce has previously expressed concern regarding any actions which may
> lead to the possibility of consumer "confusion", I now ask that the NC
> consider the ICANN domain name policy with respect to collision with names
> in the alternate root community.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html