<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: Re[2]: [ga] Call for a Working Group
I look forward to a productive Working Group on this issue. I would like to
see a time line as to its starting date.
/Bruce
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler-dompol@iodesign.com>
To: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Cc: <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [ga] Call for a Working Group
William Walsh said...
> > It is to note that Dave is employed by NeuStar, and as such, has
> > a vested interest in preventing such a working group, as his
> > employer is a partner in the new .BIZ registry, the suggested
> > topic of this working group. It is my belief that such an interest
> > calls his arguments into question, at a minimum.
>
> And by the same token those calling for the working group have a
> history of ties to the alt.root community.
>
> Bias goes both ways, but yes, those biases should be considered when
> taking comments on both side into context.
Absolutely correct on both points.
Christopher
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|