[ga] Re: Confusion in the Namespace

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Patrick,

Friday, April 13, 2001, 11:38:42 PM, Patrick Corliss wrote:

> On Saturday, April 14, 2001 3:16 PM (AEST)
> William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com> wrote:
> Subject: Re[2]: [ga] I want to be on the Inclusivbe Name Space SIG ML


>> Friday, April 13, 2001, 8:16:12 PM, Sandy Harris wrote:
>> > ( Methinks that was a bad decision. There's an obvious possible confusion
>> >   with .bz, so I don't think ICANN should allow .biz. )
>>
>> It hasn't been a major issue between .co and .com, there is really
>> little evidence it will be for .bz and .biz.
>>
>> The letter from .bz was just another "open" commercially run ccTLD
>> trying to slow namespace expansion, much like others did during the
>> workgroup C process.

> I agree with your comment that there would probably not be much confusion
> between .BIZ and .BZ but not for the reason you gave.

> The .COM is a TLD and the .CO is a 2LD so they are not at the same level.

.co is a top level domain.

Just like .au is a top level domain.


-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html