RE: [ga] I want to be on the Inclusivbe Name Space SIG ML

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

> From: Dave Crocker [mailto:dhc2@dcrocker.net]
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 11:35 PM
> 
> At 08:16 PM 4/13/2001, Sandy Harris wrote:
> >That's a contradiction. By definition, the "inclusive" 
> namespace includes
> >ICANN's space plus others things,
> 
> I have a chair.  You have a chair.  Is it possible to sit on 
> a single, 
> "inclusive" chair"
> 
> There is no "inclusive" namespace.

Typical, when you can't use reason you use faulty analogy to declare a
conclusion. Where is your proof? Chairs are not names. However, I can call a
chair instance anything I like.

> What you are suggesting is that folks who have been 
> independently running 
> their own namespace should be given power to restrict ICANN's 
> namespace.

Because it is an inclusive name space, they avoid existing names already.
The restriction goes both ways, quid pro quo. BTW, since you made this a
statement, I agree with it.

> That's not an "inclusive" namespace, it is restrictive, by virtue of 
> restricting ICANN's choices over the namespace for which it 
> has responsibility.

Your argument is not real coherent. But, essentially correct. ICANN cannot
infringe on an existing business. Welcome to the dark-side, Dave ...<g>.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html