[ga] Demanding Inclusion

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

Hi David

> They are not, however, free to come back later and demand inclusion in the
> previous namespace.  That constitutes an attempt to claim retroactive
> authority over the previous namespace administrator.

Some people may have suggested that alternative TLDS should be recognised by
ICANN.  It is true that this is seen as one possible solution to the problem.
However you are overstating your case by saying that alternative TLDs have
"demanded inclusion".

Unless that demand has been made through the proper processes and by paying the
US $50,000 to do so ??

Please nominate which alternative TLDs have "demanded inclusion" by ICANN.  You
may wish to substantiate your claim with some supporting times, dates, places,
etc.

Regards
Patrick Corliss





--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html