[ga] iCANN's protection

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Dear Roberto,
Using an analogy is good, but keeping the analogy is necessary to make a 
point ....

Since when McDonald/iCANN is to protect the liberty of the Burger Shops/TLDs?

1. possibility 1: Roberto did not keep his analogy and his point does not stand
2. possibility 2: Roberto did keep his analogy and the iCANN is selling its
     "protection" to would be TLDs against non-legacy TLDs ($ 50.000 +++).
     This would then be the best recognition of the iCANN true nature I 
never read.
     Watch your bed tomorrow before entering it!  May be an e-horse head 
... :-)

Jefsey


On 00:38 16/04/01, Sandy Harris said:
>Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>
> > >4. they only suggest from their own experience a common root to help good
> > >relations. They support iCANN, iCANN agresses them. Where is their freedom
> > >you accept?
> >
> > Wait, wait, wait!
> > I run my own burger joint, until yesterday I have been screaming and 
> yelling
> > against McDonalds, but now I support them, I really think that they should
> > let me operate in franchise, under their umbrella-organization, otherwise I
> > will consider this an aggression!
>
>Exactly. Thank you Roberto. This is the best summary I've sen so far.
>
> > (and appeal to the Constitution, the California courts, the Founding
> > Fathers, the Red Cross, the Great Pumkin,....)
>
>Clutching at straws.
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html