RE: [ga] I want to be on the Inclusivbe Name Space SIG ML

[Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.nl>]

The point is of course the term 'cooperative'. The so-called legacy   
root has hardly any history of cooperation, no has none at all.
  
There is no agreement whatsoever. The status quo is imposed by the USG
and its contractors, including ICANN. All the rest is window dressing. 

Marc Schneiders

On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, at 11:36 [=GMT+1000], Dassa wrote:

> |> -----Original Message-----
> |> From: owner-ga-full@dnso.org
> |> On Behalf Of Marc Schneiders
> |> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 11:03 AM
> |> To: Dassa
> |> Cc: Ga
> |> Subject: RE: [ga] I want to be on the Inclusivbe Name Space SIG ML
> |>
> |>
> |> On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, at 10:04 [=GMT+1000], Dassa wrote:
> |>
> |> > There is not a single name space.  There are multiple name spaces
> that
> |> > under the legacy system operate under a cooperative agreement.
> |>
> |> I would like to read that cooperative agreement.
> 
> Being facetious is not helpful.  You are aware of the history and what
> has evolved with regards to the legacy system.
> 
> |> > The alternative name spaces are not operating under that
> cooperative
> |> > agreement and are in direct competition with it.
> |>
> |> Which cooperative agreement? Competing in what way? Don't
> |> they include the so-called legacy name spaces?
> 
> Obtuse reactions are not helpful either.  Competition occurs due to
> the fact the alternative name spaces compete with the legacy system
> for users.  The fact one name space includes another doesn't mean it
> is a part of the other name space.
> 
> |> > Pure and simple.
> |>
> |> Is it? Tell me where I can read it.
> 
> Try the relevent RFC and the history archives.  Not all agreements are
> explicity written either.
> 
> Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html