RE: [ga] Dave: "they are free"

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Dear Roberto,
you will certainly use all the wrong subtilities to show you are right to 
be wrong.... :-)

We went over that a long ago and at the end of the day you gave up saying 
that it was like private PABX. I suppose that nobody is going to validate 
an extension into your own .com PABX?

Except a viruscom. And this is now what we are talking about. Your 
fiorentine discussions about could be situations your oponents fight more 
than you, are over. Reality shows that New.net and hackers are about to 
actually hijack .com after iCANN shown them how to take away .biz....

Pretty more worrying for all. Stratton Sclavos and NASDAQ first.

Jefsey


BTW thank you for your support about the two sub-MLs to be created 
(WG-Inclusive Name Space Management and WG-Review) and the way to do it. 
Would you have done it last week, it would have been perfect.



On 19:29 16/04/01, Roberto Gaetano said:
>Jeff Field wrote:
>>
>>I am the administrator for aaaq.com (I use it for email, web, etc.).  I
>>control aaaq.com and I rule when it comes to the creation of anything else
>>that is added to the left of aaaq.com, i.e., www.aaaq.com, sales.aaaq.com,
>>etc.
>>
>>Going up the ladder, VeriSign is the administrator for .com.  VeriSign
>>controls .com and VeriSign rules when it comes to the creation of anything
>>else that is added to the left of .com, i.e., domain1.com, domain2.com, etc.
>
>This makes me think of another possible example.
>(Suppose) I run an "enhanced" ;>) nameserver for .com, that includes all 
>the VeriSign SLDs plus some non-conflicting registrations of my own. I 
>obviously run an "enhanced root" that makes all this visible to the 
>overwhelming masses who point to it.
>One nice day, I discover that VeriSign is about to accept a registration 
>for foo.com, that I happen to have among my SLDs.
>I scream and yell that VeriSign fragments the domain space, and claim 
>that, in order to avoid this problem in the future, VeriSign should come 
>to an agreement with me to build a meta-.com that has to be managed by the 
>two of us "co-operatively".
>
>What do people think the answer of Mr. Sclavos will be?
>(Hint: one of the masters of the Italian theater, Eduardo de Filippo, has 
>described the concept and purpose of the so-called "pernacchio" in a 
>masterpiece, brought to the silver screen in the movie "L'oro di Napoli", 
>i.e. "The gold of Neaples")
>
>Regards
>Roberto
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html