Re[2]: [ga] Sanctions

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Harald,

Tuesday, April 17, 2001, 6:33:38 PM, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

> At 17:35 17.04.2001 -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:
>>Hello Danny,
>>
>>BTW, you are wrong in your interpretation of the rules.
>>
>>You are required to issue a call for a limit of posts before there can
>>be any such violation.
>>
>>You have issued no such call.
>>
>>"If the GA Chair or a list monitor asks for a limit to the nuber[sic] of 
>>posts per person per day, this must be respected"
>>
>>The rule is only in effect if you have issued a call for such a limit.
>>
>>I have searched the archives to find such a call, to no avail.

> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc03/msg01536.html

> The idea that a limit disappears when the chair is changed is fallacious.

Without commenting on the merit of your interpretation above, which I
do not agree with, the assertion that a call that is over 60 days old
is still in effect is fallacious.


-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html