Re: [ga] Re: Suspension of Voting Rights

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

No Mr. Crispin you should read what you quote more carefully;
" in a totally-integrated "domian name owners' constituency"."

Your lust for oneupmanship led you astray that time and now you play the fool.

Loneliness is a drink best shared with company old sir lest you forget to run
your thoughts by your dog before making them public. (ed2001)




Kent Crispin wrote:

> On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 10:15:16AM +1200, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> > At 08:58 1/05/01 -0700, Kent Crispin wrote:
> >
> > >That would grant 531400 votes to netzero, inc(*), and would radically bias
> > >the voting.
> > >
> >
> > Nobody has ever said that votes should be proportionate to the number of
> > Domain Names held.
> > A strawman argument if I ever saw one.
>
> Sorry, you should read more carefully.  Harald said, in the message I
> was replying to, the following:
>
>     Another possible form of representation would be to grant domain
>     name owners one vote per registered domain name in a
>     totally-integrated "domian name owners' constituency".
>
> Note carefully:  he said "one vote per registered domain name".
>
> --
> Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
> kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html