RE: [ga] Re: Suspension of Voting Rights

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

> From: Kent Crispin [mailto:kent@songbird.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:33 PM

> On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 10:15:16AM +1200, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> > At 08:58 1/05/01 -0700, Kent Crispin wrote:
> > 
> > >That would grant 531400 votes to netzero, inc(*), and 
> would radically bias 
> > >the voting.

> > Nobody has ever said that votes should be proportionate to 
> the number of
> > Domain Names held.
> > A strawman argument if I ever saw one.
> 
> Sorry, you should read more carefully.  Harald said, in the message I
> was replying to, the following:
> 
>     Another possible form of representation would be to grant domain
>     name owners one vote per registered domain name in a
>     totally-integrated "domian name owners' constituency". 
> 
> Note carefully:  he said "one vote per registered domain name".

Yes, and Harald missed out on the many previous discussion where that
evolved to one vote per registrant, regardless of the number of domains
held.

We keep going back through this same argument. Can someone please record
this end-result for posterity this time. This is about the umpteenth time
this issue has come up and the umpteenth minus one time it gets to the
inevitably correct conclusion.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html