RE: [ga] Re: Suspension of Voting Rights

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

> From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [mailto:harald@Alvestrand.no]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 4:34 AM
> 
> At 00:06 02.05.2001 -0700, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> >Yes, and Harald missed out on the many previous discussion where that
> >evolved to one vote per registrant, regardless of the number 
> of domains
> >held.
> 
> references (list + date) are appreciated.
> I believe you, but would like to know.

Lists;
IDNO, ORSC, DOMAIN-POLICY, DNSO/WG-C, et alia
Dates:
<Ouch>, early IDNO under membership discussions, NSI list <?> that backup
tape is unreadable to me because my DDS1 DAT tape drive died (orphaned HP
product), that also applies to ORSC and WG-C lists, for me. Yes, this is
from corruptable organic memory. But, I haven't the time to dig through the
web archives (grep doesn't work there).

> >We keep going back through this same argument. Can someone 
> please record
> >this end-result for posterity this time. This is about the 
> umpteenth time
> >this issue has come up and the umpteenth minus one time it 
> gets to the
> >inevitably correct conclusion.
> 
> since we haven't come up with a reasonable way to implement 
> the "inevitably correct conclusion", it's likely to resurface for the 
> umpteenth + 1 time.

Since we can't implement it, why are we chewing this cud again?

> query: does this discussion (who votes in the DNSO) belong on the new 
> ga-review list?

Most likely ...
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html