Re: [ga] Appendix U

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

No it is not interesting at all!  It is a damned abomination.  This is why I
screamed so hard about changing votin rules for the GA in progress. (believe it
or not I do not want to be chair).  This redefinition and convenient memory as
to established rules is the epitomy of bad faith and lack of due process.  It is
the reason for "going postal" unfairness is the greatest grieveance on earth and
believe me ICANN will feel that wrath lest it get it's -----together. Remember
Tienamen, the Wall, Kent State, book burning it is not the injury to the person
but the denial of right that causes the greatest amoung us, previously silent to
come forward and become a lady of honor.

Sincerely,

Gene Marsh wrote:

> Interesting that certain applicants were panned for not providing this
> information openly (without confidentiality) during the application process
> last year.
>
> Gene...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Harald
> > Tveit Alvestrand
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 8:08 AM
> > To: Bret Fausett
> > Cc: ga@dnso.org
> > Subject: Re: [ga] Appendix U
> >
> >
> > At 22:24 30.04.2001 -0700, Bret Fausett wrote:
> > >Kent Crispin wrote:
> > > > We can either delay now while the DNSO grinds through several
> > months of
> > > > inconclusive rambling, or we can delay later while the confidentiality
> > > > clauses tick away.
> > >
> > >I don't see months of rambling as an option. These contracts will be
> > >revised, or not, in the next week. I'd rather see the
> > confidentiality delays
> > >fixed now than left in. I read in Danny's message that he fully
> > appreciated
> > >the time pressures on this.
> >
> > Note that the most long-lasting confidentiality requirement in
> > the Afilias
> > contract (the one I checked) is 18 months, and covers ONLY reports that
> > reveal how much money they used for advertising (sections 2.1 and 4.4).
> >
> > I think a fair amount of evaluation can be done without this info.
> >
> >
> >
> > >        -- Bret
> > >
> > >--
> > >This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > >Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > >("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html