RE: [ga] MOTION: Request for a GA resolution on an IDN holders' c onstituency (IC)

["L Gallegos" <jandl@jandl.com>]

If you hold a domain name, you want the IC which doesn not exist.  You 
could also join the non-commecial SO, if your site falls into that 
category.  There is no prohibition on joining more than one.  The bone of 
contention is that there is no place for the individual domain name 
holder or small business that is not controlled by a faction that is at 
cross purposes with that part of the community.  The major 
corporations have the business SO, the IP interests have their SO, the 
non-coms have theirs, but everyone else is in limbo with no voice.

We need the at-large and we need an SO for individuals and small 
business.  Those are the ones being mauled by the major corps and IP 
interests.

Leah


On 8 May 2001, at 12:42, McMeikan, Andrew wrote:

> No I was not confused, just trying to get it stated in a way that would
> avoid confusion.
> 
> I guess I did not succeed.  I will state my opinions so that hopefully my
> position will be clearer.
> 
> * I challenge no ones right to do stuff one the net, although I challenge
> ICANN for its attempt to limit others rights.
> 
> * If there is to be a body like ICANN that does wish to decide what can and
> can not be done, then as many that are affected should be represented.
> 
> * There are other things on the net than web pages and these need to be
> protected just as much.
> 
> * I own a domain name with non-commercial content hosted on 'free' web
> providers, I want to be in a constituency and be heard.
> 
> * there used to be a net before DNS and there will still be one after its
> gone.
> 
> 
>  cya,	Andrew...
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales [SMTP:vany@sdnp.org.pa]
> > Sent:	Tuesday, May 08, 2001 11:31 AM
> > To:	GA
> > Subject:	RE: [ga] MOTION: Request for a GA resolution on an IDN
> > holders' constituency (IC)
> > 
> > Hi Andrew:
> > 
> > I have realized that you are confused between the At Large and the IC.
> > 
> > The IC and Individual Domain Names Holders.  The At Large membership are
> > any Internet user holds or not holds a domain, that are interested in the
> > policy developing in the subjects of:  Domain Names, IP addresses space
> > and Protocols.
> > 
> > El lun, 07 may 2001, McMeikan, Andrew escribió:
> > > I think that to propose the creation of an IC it at least needs a
> > > little definition to go along with it rather than just implied on the
> > > subject
> > line.
> > > 
>  <snip>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html