Re[2]: [ga] MOTION: Request for a GA resolution on an IDN holders' constituency (IC)

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Roeland,

Tuesday, May 08, 2001, 4:40:18 PM, Roeland Meyer wrote:
>> I cannot support any motion that makes mention of the so-called IDNO.

> Joe, we already know that you, and your elitist buddies, do not want
> individuals to have any say, in any part of the Internet. I bet you and Kent
> still think "blue laws" are also appropriate and human-rights is a figment
> ... Yes, we are [through your repetitive ranting] disgustingly well aware of
> your views.

Nice twisting of what he said, Roeland.

He said he >>supports<< the more for an individual's constituency.

The caveat that any such motion not refer to the IDNO in any fashion,
or grant any recognition to the IDNO, is a reasonable one based on
it's history.

Objecting to any IDNO related language is not anywhere what you imply
above in your excessive criticism.

Take a step back, and tone your attacks down.  The effort for an
individual's constituency doesn't need your kind of behavior above.

-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh
mailto:william@userfriendly.com
Owner, Userfriendly.com
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html