<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Letter from Lynn to Sheppard
At 01:31 AM 5/10/2001 -0400, Danny reprinted a letter from Stuart Lynn
responding to the proposal that ICANN provide funds for the DNSO:
>[snip]
>Certainly other questions arose. Since 90% of ICANN's discretionary
>funds (that is, the portion not earmarked for a corresponding
>expense) comes from certain DNSO constituencies, for ICANN to provide
>financial support to the DNSO Secretariat would in effect be
>returning funds already raised from those constituencies. In other
>words, ICANN would be increasing its expenditures by $100,000 for
>which there would be a corresponding increase of $90,000 contributed
>from certain DNSO constituencies (the remaining 10% would essentially
>come from ASO contributed funds). If those constituencies wish to
>contribute $90,000 to the DNSO Secretariat, can they not choose to do
>so directly within the DNSO budget framework?
Lynn's letter does suggest a way forward: Constituencies can
contribute to the DNSO budget in the same proportion that they contribute
to ICANN's base revenues directly. Using the numbers from the proposed
2001-2002 budget, that would translate roughly to: 60% from the
unsponsored gTLD registries; 26% from the ccTLDs; 10% from the registrars;
3% from the sponsored TLD registries; and zippo from B&C, IPC, ISPCPC, and
NCDNHC. The numbers would take some tweaking (that's rather too much for
the ccTLDs), but it's a start.
Jon
Jonathan Weinberg
weinberg@msen.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|