<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] 2001-2002 Budget
Danny Younger wrote:
> To the members of the Budget Group and Finance Committee:
>
> The membership of the General Assembly understands that you have advised the
> President of ICANN with respect to the proposed budget for 2001-2002. We
> are concerned by published reports that this proposed budget has not
> allocated any funds for At-Large Elections,
[speaking entirely for myself]
damn shamefaced! Why the hell did they even bother to give Pindar and crew the
450 grand? to sit around twiddling their thumbs? hey Kendall, here's another
theme for your ICANNstage. I guess their at-large study website includes a
whole lot of MAINTENANCE COSTS! LOL too much activity going on over there, for
sure!
I am not angry, not in the least bit.
RRRROOOOOOAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!! <beats his chest savagely>
> in spite of past promises to
> choose at least five more Board members through this electoral process.
Shame!
> We
> would appreciate the benefit of your thoughts on this matter.
Yeah, and just skip the malarkey and give it to us straight for once! We're all
grown-ups here...
Best Regards,
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
Reminder: RFC 1591 The truth will set you free!
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|