<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: 2001-2002 Budget
what about the timing issue? if the committee were to report in favor of
elections, will there be time to hire staff, gear up, get the money?
Also, isn't ICANN going to do any 'maintenance' on membership - keep up
the web page, allow changes of address etc, so as not to lose whatever
momentum may exist? Failure to do so could be very costly.
--
Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm
-->It's hot here.<--
On Fri, 11 May 2001, vint cerf wrote:
> folks,
>
> this begs the question of the report from the at-large study which is
> supposed to include consideration of funding among many other things.
>
> It makes more sense to me for the board and finance committee to take this
> matter up after we have recommendations from Carl Bildt's committee in
> hand.
>
> vint
>
> At 07:33 AM 5/11/2001 -0500, Bruce James wrote:
> >>>>I support Danny Younger's position. The least that the Board should
> >do, is make some sort of provision in case there will be elections.
> >Marc Schneiders<<<
> >
> >I agree also, this just another slap in our face. We should have a budget
> >for Elections or the whole purpose of ICANN's *bottom up mission* is another
> >falsehood.
> >
> >We really do care about ICANN, but we also demand that they follow their
> >Mission!
> >
> >We, the people, DEMAND representation on the ICANN Board through Elections!
> >
> >/Bruce James/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Marc Schneiders" <marc@venster.nl>
> >To: "Danny Younger" <webmaster@babybows.com>
> >Cc: <ga@dnso.org>
> >Sent: May 11, 2001 04:13
> >Subject: Re: [ga] Re: 2001-2002 Budget
> >
> >
> >On Fri, 11 May 2001, at 03:45 [=GMT-0400], Danny Younger wrote:
> >
> >> Would you rather get answers for the questions that affect us all before
> >> this Budget is voted upon, or would you prefer that we debate this issue
> >for
> >> a few more weeks (following your definition of proper procedure) and allow
> >> the Board to act on this matter without the benefit of our input?
> >
> >I support Danny Younger's position. The least that the Board should
> >do, is make some sort of provision in case there will be elections.
> >
> >Marc Schneiders
> >
> >--
> >This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> >Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> >("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|