Re: [ga] Re: 2001-2002 Budget

[vint cerf <vcerf@mci.net>]

The upcoming meeting will be a good time to review this

vint

At 10:20 AM 5/11/2001 -0400, Jon Weinberg wrote:
>Vint --
>
>    Here's the crux of the problem:  The ICANN bylaws state that the Board
>will "take final action on the [At-Large] study no later than the Annual
>Meeting of the Corporation in 2001; and [c.] any actions taken by the Board
>as a result of the study that require the selection of any "At Large"
>Directors should be implemented on a schedule that will allow any new "At
>Large" Directors to be seated no later than the conclusion of the Annual
>Meeting of the Corporation in 2002."  (Remember that the terms of the
>existing at-large directors expire in 2002.)  But here we see a budget,
>running from July 1, 2001 to June 30, 2002, that includes *no* allowance for
>any possible expenditures relating to an election, preparation of voter
>lists, etc.  The result:  If the Committee should recommend that a new round
>of elections should be held, and if the Board should adopt that
>recommendation, it will be impossible for the corporation to move forward
>with that course of action on the schedule that the by-laws require.
>
>Jon
>
>
>Jonathan Weinberg
>weinberg@msen.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html