<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Austerity measures
Philip,
Let me add a couple of words to Alexander's comments below.
>
>Well, it not so surprising that there is duplication,
>considering that GA-full is GA *plus* the postings
>of people temporarily banned according to the list rules.
>
Plus spam messages (and generally speaking submissions from non-members),
that are filtered.
>
>The list is a result of a heated discussion regarding
>a potential problem which -- at least in my view, but
>maybe me being a list monitor makes me biased ;) --
>has not happened and I hope will never happen.
>
>Taking away the choice may make further discussions
>about breaches of the list rules resemble the bitter
>struggles before the two lists compromise was reached.
Additionally, there will be very little advantage (timewise) in abolishing
the ga-full, IMHO, as it is completely unmoderated and therefore will
require less work than the other lists.
OTOH, I would not recommend to shut down the moderated list either, as the
vast majority of the subscriber seem to prefer (and implicitely endorse) the
monitoring effort.
Regards
Roberto
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|