ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Austerity measures


Philip,

Let me add a couple of words to Alexander's comments below.

>
>Well, it not so surprising that there is duplication,
>considering that GA-full is GA *plus* the postings
>of people temporarily banned according to the list rules.
>

Plus spam messages (and generally speaking submissions from non-members), 
that are filtered.

>
>The list is a result of a heated discussion regarding
>a potential problem which -- at least in my view, but
>maybe me being a list monitor makes me biased ;) --
>has not happened and I hope will never happen.
>
>Taking away the choice may make further discussions
>about breaches of the list rules resemble the bitter
>struggles before the two lists compromise was reached.

Additionally, there will be very little advantage (timewise) in abolishing 
the ga-full, IMHO, as it is completely unmoderated and therefore will 
require less work than the other lists.
OTOH, I would not recommend to shut down the moderated list either, as the 
vast majority of the subscriber seem to prefer (and implicitely endorse) the 
monitoring effort.

Regards
Roberto


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>