<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Joop's motions
Leah,
You wrote:
>On 14 May 2001, at 21:52, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> > I would not recommend, for the time being, to create a separate SO for
> > users, but to encourage the users that may feel the interest to
>participate
> > in the existing ones.
>
>Which ones, Roberto? Isn't that the point? There are no SO's where
>they fit. There would be the @large if it existed. IMO, that is the place
>for users to have input. It would need to be organized and recognized,
>of course and this is precisely the point about which Danny wrote in his
>message. IMO, it is very pertinent to the GA discussions.
Sorry, I was less clear than I thought.
My argument was in favour of user participation in the supporting
organizations, and, inter alia, the DNSO.
How? First answer: the GA. Second answer: possibly a constituency.
For the other SOs, I would assume the similar would hold, but it is
something that will be discussed elsewhere.
Bill Lowell raised the point of the AtLarge: indeed there's room there, but
there is still a lot of work to do to build a more permanent structure that
will allow AtLarge members to communicate.
Last but not least, of course this subject is pertinent to the GA
discussions - I would never had taken the risk of being suspended for
out-of-scope posting ;>)
Regards
Roberto
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|