<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] [GA] Gigalaw poll on "domain names not sanctioned by ICANN"
Or whether they were correctly informed that there is little chance such
domain names would or could affect the "stability" of the Internet
whatsoever?
It seems someone perhaps forgot to mention that to them ...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roberto Gaetano" <ga_list@hotmail.com>
To: <wsl@cerebalaw.com>; <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] [GA] Gigalaw poll on "domain names not sanctioned by
ICANN"
> Bill,
>
> >
> > The question was "What do you think of domain names not sanctioned by
> >ICANN?"
> >
> >56.4% say they "threaten the stability of the Internet."
> >
> >43.59% say they "foster healthy competition."
> >
>
>
> Any indication on what the population was?
> I mean, were they maily lawyers? Technical people? Commercial
people?Average
> users?
>
> Thanks
> Roberto
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|