Re: [ga] Motion - Individual User Constituency - Acknowldegement for aStudy

["William S. Lovell" <wsl@cerebalaw.com>]

Disagree, since I think that users represent an ICANN-wide issue
that does not fall specifically into the DNSO function.  Of course,
this quibble might not make the slightest difference -- it will end
up on the Board table no matter who initially proposed it -- and
"any group" (or words to that effect) can do that.  But still, the GA
has a whole lot on its plate right now, and cannot simultaneously
be Don Quixote for everything.

Bill Lovell

Jefsey Morfin wrote:

> I move the following motion to the Chair:
>
> "
> The General Assembly of the DNSO resolves to express its
> support for the acknowledgement of the need for an Individual
> Users Constituency by the ICANN Board in accordance with its
> Bylaws. The General Assembly of the DNSO recommends to
> the ICANN Board that to foster the study and the preparation
> of such an Individual User Constituency it places an approval
> in principle on its agenda for a decision at the Stockholm
> plennary session.
>
> Agree/Disagree
> "
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html