RE: [ga] Motion - DNS Developer Constituency - Acknowledgement of r study

["Gene Marsh" <marshm@anycast.net>]

Marilyn,

I think the "essence", as put below, is the "legitimacy" of any
constituency.  Does a constituency's legitimacy depend, for better or worse,
on its original inclusion in the ICANN bylaws?

In that vein, I would agree with Patrick's view.  There appears to be a
higher threshhold for entry of a new constituency than for those originally
included.  The effect could be a perception that other constituencies are
considered nonsequitur with ICANN's view of the world.  This would be
incongruous with their mission, in my opinion.

Gene...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
> Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 5:15 PM
> To: 'Patrick Greenwell'
> Cc: 'William S. Lovell'; Jefsey Morfin; ga@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [ga] Motion - DNS Developer Constituency - Acknowledgement
> of r study
>
>
>
> Patrick, I am not sure that my question would hold them to a higher
> standard. That would remain to be seen, if they emerge with sufficient
> organizations, people, and time to develop a constituency, develop bylaws,
> identify funding, etc.
>
> In essence, though, I think that asking such a question about any new
> constituency is a reasonable thing to do.... and that is what I was doing.
>
> :-)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Greenwell [mailto:patrick@stealthgeeks.net]
> Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 5:00 PM
> To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
> Cc: 'William S. Lovell'; Jefsey Morfin; ga@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [ga] Motion - DNS Developer Constituency - Acknowledgement
> fo r study
>
>
> On Sun, 20 May 2001, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
>
> > Disagree. I am unclear on whether this community is a distinct community
> > that is large enough to devote the time needed to create, and
> then sustain
> a
> > constituency.  Perhaps it is, but there hasn't been any analysis which
> > documents that, or the sustainability, including participating in a
> > meaningful way in ICANN, bearing the cost of funding the DNSO... etc.
>
> It is a bit inappropriate to hold this nascent effort to higher standards
> than were placed upon those forming the original constituencies, don't you
> think?
>
> /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
> /\/\/\/\/\
> /\
>                                Patrick Greenwell
>                        Earth is a single point of failure.
> \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
> \/\/\/\/\/
> \/
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html