Re: [ga] Amended Ballot

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

I am very concerned about dilution.  If the SO system is to work, it is by it's
very nature disciminatory and exclusive within each constitutency. (if you think I
am wrong look at the ccTLD and the IP charters)  We have a major problem in that
as soon as you create it and put someone in place to run it, they are disqualified
by their position. Please read "Animal Farm".

I am sure that men as intelligent and experienced as Chris and Jeff can solve this
problem.

Sincerely,

Jeff Williams wrote:

> Chris and all assembly members,
>
>   I agree iwht you on this  Chris.  I belive that Jefsey has intorduced
> those motions to address these differences...
>
> NameCritic wrote:
>
> > Personally I disagree, but will support it if most wish to go this route. To
> > me an IC is not the same as an IDNHC. I think both should petition for
> > inclusion as seperate constituencies. One requires you own a domain name and
> > the other does not.
> >
> > Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
> > To: "babybows.com" <webmaster@babybows.com>
> > Cc: <ga@dnso.org>; <DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org>;
> > <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>
> > Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 3:11 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ga] Amended Ballot
> >
> > > Danny and all assembly members,
> > >
> > >  Agree.
> > >
> > > babybows.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > The author of the motion, Joop Teernstra, has asked to amend his motion.
> > > > The ballot is accordingly amended.
> > > >
> > > > The General Assembly of the DNSO resolves to express its support for the
> > > > immediate acknowledgement of an Individuals' Constituency (a
> > constituency of
> > > > Individual Domain Name holders)  by the ICANN Board in accordance with
> > its
> > > > Bylaws.  The General Assembly of the DNSO recommends to the ICANN Board
> > that
> > > > it place either the creation of such an Individuals' Constituency or the
> > > > "approval in principle" on its agenda for a decision at the Stockholm
> > > > plenary session.
> > > >
> > > > Agree/Disagree
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
> > > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > > E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> > > Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
> > > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> > >
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html