Re: [ga] Fw: We Are Mad As Hell And Doing Something!

["William S. Lovell" <wsl@cerebalaw.com>]

Andy Gardner wrote:

> At 10:19 am -0700 5/24/01, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> >They stopped using the internic addr some time ago.
>
> I know. And wiped out the previous archives that were linked to from
> multiple web pages.
>
> I said the "Internic TM" not "Internic addr". ICANN/DOC has licenced the
> Internic TM to them. Correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> What I'm saying is if they're allowed to licence the TM, they should be
> made to host the legacy Internic DOMAIN-POLICY list. If they don't want to
> host it, take their Internic TM license away.

Seems correct (I am a lawyer but don't give legal advice on the internet) as
to
the law, but maybe assumes that the licensor (ICANN- DOC) really gives a rip,
so as to require certain things from the licensee (NSI/Verisign).  Don't think
so.
(That license, by the way, is another part of the internet giveaway of public
property -- were there royalties required, that would go into the Federal
coffers?)

Bill Lovell

>
>
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Andy Gardner [mailto:andy@navigator.co.nz]
> >> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 9:15 AM
> >> To: ga@dnso.org
> >> Subject: Re: [ga] Fw: We Are Mad As Hell And Doing Something!
> >>
> >>
> >> At 8:45 am -0700 5/24/01, Tim Langdell, PhD wrote:
> >> >This got posted on the NETSOLS list early this morning and
> >> was swiftly
> >> >followed by the entire list being closed by VeriSign - for
> >> good. Anyone have
> >> >any insight as to what is going on here?
> >>
> >> How does "guilty as charged" sound?
> >>
> >> Interestingly, the domain policy list was something Verisign
> >> inherited from
> >> its predecessor.
> >>
> >> Since it now seems to not want to provide such functions,
> >> perhaps it should
> >> give back its licence for the use of the Internic TM as well?
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andrew P. Gardner
> >> barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform
> >> about the UDRP?
> >> We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
> >> Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
> >> --
> >> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> >> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> >> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> >> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >>
>
> --
> Andrew P. Gardner
> barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
> We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
> Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
         Bill Lovell

http://cerebalaw.com/biog.htm


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html