Re: [ga] Second request for comments on the GA agenda

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Danny and all assembly members,

  Understood.  However the DNSO secretariat has already sent out the
announcement of what the DNSO agenda is.  See:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010602.NCstockholm-agenda.html
Hence my question to you and the assembly members.  It seems
that you are a bit tardy in making this second request....

  From what I discovered from the archives, only one of the items
that I suggested/requested made it to the agenda items list (Whois).
I also noticed that NONE of the other items that I gleaned from the
archives were added to the DNSO Agenda for Stolkholm.  That
should make for allot of excitement in Stolkholm I would imagine...

  However if the Agenda is available for modification, can you let us know,
and will the DNSO secretariat please send to the list an appropriate
posting to that effect?

  Thank you for you interest and consideration in advance.  >;)



Danny Younger wrote:

> Thank you Jeff,
>
> While I am aware of the agenda items cited in the archives, I am also aware
> that many that subscribe to our list do not actively participate on the
> list, hence another call for final contributions on this topic before
> Stockholm.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Williams [mailto:jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 8:36 AM
> To: Danny Younger
> Cc: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] Second request for comments on the GA agenda
>
> Danny and all assembly members,
>
>   Danny, I counted some 21 different offers for agenda items in the
> Archives.  Have you reviewed them possibly?  I also sent two
> potential agenda items directly to you as well....
>
> Danny Younger wrote:
>
> > Although an invitation was formally extended to the Names Council to join
> > the GA in dialogue, allowing each NC Interim Committee Chair ample
> > opportunity to discuss the Terms-of-Reference that their respective
> > committees have decided upon, and providing each with an opportunity to
> > outline to the GA the degree to which we will be invited to participate in
> > committee efforts, this invitation has been graciously declined by the NC
> > Chair.
> >
> > I have responded to Philip Sheppard, advising him that I will convey the
> > sentiments of the GA to the NC, and that I will address the NC with regard
> > to the GA's work-item agenda.
> >
> > As many have previously criticized both the Chair and the Co-Chair of this
> > Assembly for purportedly having an agenda, I am asking our membership to
> put
> > forward their views so that the Chair may report such views to the NC.  I
> > look forward to your comments.
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html