ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Observations...


Go get dismayed Danny,

Do you doubt for a second that I support these two propositions, did I not have
behind the scene direct armtwisting involvement in achieving their resolve?  I am
not a head to be counted and I work for thousands of voices to be heard.  I chose
not to vote, so as to include my voice at a strategic time when you are in
Stockholm.

Do not worry the effect will be the same, only anticipated.  But please do not reach
down and bash us.  You have our support may we have yours?

Yes, this is public to allow you to reassure us of your intentions and resolve.

Best to you, your wife and beautiful children on this wonderful Holiday of memories.

Memorial day - What will they call it; Cyber day, Virtual day, Freedom of Access
day, when we free ourselves of the bonds that bind us: When Mr. Macdonald may have
his MacDonalds web site for him and all his great grand kids, Wow a virtual picnic
including potatoe salad, and no burgers.

Sincerely,

Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:

> Actually, I voted onlist in favour of the first resolution (i.e. recognition of
> an IC in principle by the BoD), and I simply missed the call for the vote on the
> second resolution.  In any case,  I did not vote officially as I did not receive
> a ballot, and NOT because I was not interested in voting.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>
> Danny Younger wrote:
>
> > Lessons to be learned from the voting process:
> >
> > As I review the names of those who actually voted on the GA ballot questions
> > http://www.dnso.org/secretariat/b05fullrecord.html , I note that perhaps
> > only 18 out of the 91 voters had posted any comments to the GA list in the
> > last month.  Frankly, most of the voters are unknown to me.   Simply put, a
> > full 80% of those voting do not actively participate on our GA list.  You
> > may want to think about why this happens to be the case, and forward some
> > suggestions as to how we may make improvements.
> >
> > I was also quite dismayed to note that many our members who posted in the
> > last month did not choose to vote:
> > Appleby, Cade, Cochetti, Conant, Crispin, Crocker, Dassa, Dierker, Edelman,
> > Fausett, Froomkin, Gaetano, Gardner, Greenwell, Harris, Hernand, Kelly,
> > Kelsey, Ladi, Langdell, Levin, Marsh, Meyer, Mueller, Narra, Neuman,
> > Portneuve, Roberts, Schneiders, Semich, Sheppard, Sotiropoulos, Stoen,
> > Stubbs, Svensson.
> >
> > You may also want to think about why regular contributors have decided not
> > to participate in a vote.
> >
> > You may wish to also note that over 70% of the members on our voting
> > registry decided not to vote.  Perhaps we need to look at this "registry"
> > list, and ask ourselves if we need a mechanism to keep it "current".
> >
> > If we are going to transform this Assembly into a body that is reasonably
> > functional and representative, we may need to re-think our approach.  I am
> > open to further suggestions, observations, and comments on how we can work
> > to improve our Assembly.
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>