<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] GA-REVIEW & Other Mailing Lists
Patrick C wrote:
> Hi Michael
>
> > IMHO, I agree with Marilyn....we need to avoid being critical. We do also
> > need to look at the problem of multiple lists. There are several
> solutions.
> >
> > 1) reduce the number of lists
>
> Agreed -- eleven is too many. The problem is the seven sublists should be
> reduced to five or less. I'd suggest the following:
>
> [ga] and [ga-full] leave these alone unless there's a formal vote
Agreed. They are really the same list just one lightly moderated. No-one will
be a member fo both - it is one or the other.
> [ga-announce] encourage the DNSO Secretariat to use it or lose it
Need to keep for elections etc.
> [ga-icann] mainstream issue. scrap the list.
Agreed - will always be discussed on main GA
> [ga-rules] like an O/S it essential to separate levels of
> debate.
I think it is useful that the main GA list doesn't get flooded with process
discussions so agree.
> [ga-abuse] replace with a website-based complaints system
Up to those who use it. This isn't a public list so not so impt.
> [ga-roots] it's the most popular. let it run.
Agreed.
> [ga-udrp] special interest group must be interested
Hopefully it will become more relevant once WIPO submits its formal
recommendations.
> [ga-org] -- ditto --
The NC has specifically asked us to start the ball rolling here so great
opportunity for us to perform.
> [ga-sys] meant for detailed issues like registration
> systems
Has it had any traffic? Could be chopped IMO.
DPF
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|