Re: Re[2]: [ga] [ADMIN] Four Week Suspension of Eric Dierker

["Earl Heather" <earl@pheather.com>]

and therein lies your error
"The moderators must be able to act independently."

No moderator(s) should EVER be able to act independantly, in secret 
or without appeal.

Public,open and transparent handling of the complaint process is what 
has been missing, allowing the process to be manipulated by a few, to 
the detriment of the list.

For example

WHO FILED THE COMPLAINTS ?

Earl Heather

> Hello Earl,
> 
> Wednesday, June 20, 2001, 6:03:39 PM, Earl Heather wrote:
> 
> > Or the members of this list should make the final decision,
> > not the moderators. 
> 
> No.  The moderators must be able to act independently.  Requiring a
> vote on every action is prohibitive, and effectively means we have no
> rules.
> 
> However, I think it is reasonable to place a limit on the moderators.
> 
> If more than a week has passed from the violation, the moderators
> cannot act.
> 
> Maybe this will motivate them to review complaints in a more timely
> manner and take more appropriate actions.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> DNS Services from $1.65/mo
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> 
> 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html