<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re[2]: [ga] Consensus
Hello L,
Sunday, June 24, 2001, 5:48:22 PM, L Gallegos wrote:
> And that's the point, I think. How can one arrive at or determine
> consensus when it is not even defined as a process? Define
> "general agreement." It still boils down to majority rule.
No, actually it doesn't.
The Names Council defines consensus as 2/3 I believe.
This was also the criteria we used in Workgroup C.
I believe it to be a fair criteria for consensus.
--
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|