Re: [ga] UDRP Questionnaire

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Dear Philip,
as you may recall the UDRP is supposed to be about domain names. As you may 
also have noted the UDRP document does not define what is a domain name, 
while it defines all the other DNS oriented specific words it uses. This 
make the UDRP an interesting document to address many other disputes of 
general nature, but not any of specific nature involving domain names.

I therefore suggest that the NC adds a topic about the definition of the 
Domain Name.
Jefsey


PS. Joop has recently made a site about possible DN definitions. This might 
help.

I note that the only iCANN oriented document which alludes the need of such 
a definition is the contract proposed by ccTLDs to the iCANN. It quotes the 
DN as something to be defined in its recital but it does not propose a 
definition. It would be fun if the DN was defined by the CCSO rather than 
by the DNSO...




At 09:39 30/06/01, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>Philip,
>
>As one of the first goals of the NC's UDRP Task Force is to complete an
>appropriate questionnaire, and as the General Assembly has previously
>expressed concerns that past questionnaires perhaps have not been properly
>designed, would you be amenable to adding a qualified "expert" on
>questionnaires/polling to this Task Force?
>
>Danny
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html