RE: [ga] UDRP Questionnaire

["Hugh Blair" <hblair@bigfoot.com>]

Great shot.  I'll hold the strong words I *could* say about how it's
worked so far.  Not being a lawyer (but why should I be?), this
is exactly what I'd like it to be.

Thanks for being so lucid.

-Hugh
____________________________

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Dierker [mailto:eric@hi-tek.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 9:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [ga] UDRP Questionnaire
>
>
> 1. Based upon the evidence submitted all documentation and arguments we
find
> that there is no merit to the complainants allegations and deny
> the petition.
>
> 2. In that there appears to the satisfaction of the arbitrators that there
is a
> prima facie case stated we find this matter should go forward and advise
the
> parties to submit further memorandum upon the issues presented which we
find to
> be; _______.  Both parties have a forthwith ten day (10 day) period in
which to
> respond.
>
> 3. We find that there is a prima facie case stated but that there are
arguable
> factors which mitigate against enforcement of any mark or copyright action
such
> that we refuse to issue an opinion and refer the matter to non-conclusion.
> With this finding we specifically direct the registrar and registry take
no
> action on this matter until further ordered by a tribunal.
>
> Just a shot in the dark, what say thee?
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Eric Hugh Dierker
>
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html