Re: [ga] language legalities

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

I believe that there is generality of truth to what Mr. Heath writes.
The Individuals unit will need to implement funding and ability and support for
multicultural and multilingual programs and translation or it will not have my
support.  I agree that it may take time but it must be part of an integrated and
*enforceable*  part of it's charter.
Eric

Steven Heath wrote:

> Paul Svensson did say:
>
> > On the NeuLevel www.nic.biz webpage it's stated:
> >> Due to legal restrictions, all legal forms and documents are available in
> English only.
>
> > Could someone explain what's the issue here,
> > what restrictions are they referring to ?
>
> This is only a guess at the reasons, I have no 'inside' knowledge of
> NeuLevel and I am not a lawyer nor play one on TV.
>
> This issue in providing contracts in different languages is they each have
> variations that are not always apparent when first written. This then means
> as contracts are changed and tweaked the points of difference start to grow
> and the contract in, say, Spanish offers different rights than say the one
> in Kanji. So to make it easy on NeuLevel they have appeared to say 'ok, lets
> just offer it in English'. On a personal side I would expect that if a
> contract was in Kanji then the court of the land would be Japan where I
> think NeuLevel would not want it to be.
>
> The GA often has trouble agreeing on meaning or understanding of words
> (consensus and wanton come to mind) and we are (to the large degree) only
> using English to communicate with each other).
>
> Steven Heath
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html