<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re[2]: [ga] Fw: ICANN's Karl Auerbach responds to Joe Sims over .kids domain
Hello Karl,
Friday, July 06, 2001, 5:42:19 PM, Karl Auerbach wrote:
> Right. And I find it very troubling that ICANN has undertaken what, to my
> mind, amounts to a vague, and probably unenforceable, promise to the
> internet community that .info and the ICANN approved version of .biz will
> be used in particular ways.
Please show where they promised anything for .info except that it was
an open unrestricted gTLD?
But that said, I completely agree with you on this:
> Is "using" a domain name to be measured by web services, by e-mail
> services, by chat or messaging services, ... ? And what is ICANN going to
> do if somebody deep down in the ICANN approved .biz should be hosting an
> instant-message-based "escort" business?
> That kind of thing simply is not part of "technical" coordination of the
> DNS - that's the kind of thing that is better suited for a legislature to
> handle.
> As a general matter, it's my feeling that ICANN ought to be absolutely
> blind to any purported semantics of a domain name. There are plenty of
> laws on the books already to handle defamation, trademark infringement,
> misappropriation of identity, misrepresentation, etc. We don't need to
> overlay that system with a lex-ICANNia.
Agreed. 101%
--
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|