<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Dependence of the Names Council -- Case Proved
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 00:11:27 +1000, Patrick Corliss wrote:
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc07/msg02599.html
> It seems to me that there are two or three approaches which can be used
> assuming you agree with the hypothesis that the General Assembly is not
> working as intended. Probable reasons are as follows:
>
> (1) Lack of Resources, Dependency. The GA is hamstrung by the NC
> control over GA operations. They (the NC) control the budget for travel
> to ICANN conferences, secretariat, website, legal advice, translation etc.
> The DNSO Secretariat is answerable to the NC not the GA. The NC closed
> down all the working groups at whim. More importantly the NC controls
> the mailing lists and the website.
<snip other reasons>
There's no point in pursuing the issue any further. I've proved my case.
QED.
Best regards
Patrick Corliss
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|