Re: [ga] Mailing List Management/ Clutter

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Are simple niceties clutter? are me toos clutter?  Is a public "that a girl"
clutter? I am going to sign up and pay my 15 year old son to monitor this list.
At a 15 year old level of reading and comprehension, I anticipate 1 hour per
day, which will include background research.  I will not poison the well (any
more than I already did;-})
He is not expected to participate but will issue reports to his IT teachers and
me. (or is that I?) But I will leave that to him.  To be fair I will give him a
heads-up on the silly initials we all love. I will be demanding some
bilingualism in his reports, he speaks and writes Spanish. Let us see if there
is anything here that a 15 year old surfer dude cannot deal with.

My hypothesis is that there are not problems with the reality of our list. Yes,
rules need to be more clearly defined and individuals as opposed to *interests*
need a more valued position.  But our only real problem exists from the top
down.  If the BoD and DoC funded and facilitated our work and then incorporated
our work product ICANN would not only succeed but help the world.

Sincerely,

Patrick Corliss wrote:

> On Sat, 7 Jul 2001 02:32:29 +1000, Patrick Corliss wrote:
> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc05/msg00582.html
>
> > One problem is the number of people who use [ga-abuse] as a sort of
> > *drop-in* chat room.  The worst offender, as you might expect, is Eric
> > Dierker.  What that does is clutter the decision-making process.
>
> On Sat, 07 Jul 2001 10:28:28 -0700, Eric Dierker replied:
> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc07/msg03484.html
>
> > I apologize for not noticing earlier but my name was referenced in the
> > offending post in a negative manner that I believe may have contributed to
> > this decision by Danny.  If that is the case I want to make sure that I in
> > no way am insulted or bothered by Mr. Corliss's post.  It seemed fair
> > comment to me.
>
> On this I would issue a correction.   I should have said:
>
> The worst offender, Eric Dierker, has now apologised and turned over a
> new leaf  http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga-full/Arc07/msg03406.html
> However, unnecessary copies do clutter up the list and impede the list
> monitors' decision-making processes.  The problem is still very real.
>
> On Sat, 7 Jul 2001 21:19:47 +1000, Patrick Corliss also wrote:
> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc07/msg03478.html
> > Effectively you are saying that the Alternate Chair cannot report serious
> > concerns in a private communication to members of the Names Council.
>
> I would correct that statement also to read:
>
> As Alternate Chair, I was reporting serious concerns in what I thought
> was a *private* communication to members of the Names Council.
>
> Regards
> Patrick Corliss
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html