<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Motion to the Chair
Joops motion, and his comments regarding ostracism, essentially express the
sentiment that something is so seriously wrong with our GA list that we must
immediately act to correct the problem.
I took it upon myself to tabulate the comments posted to our list in the last
month. From June 8 to July 8 there were 1021 posts to the main GA list by 62
individuals. Six people accounted for half of all the posts.
Looking at the archives on a day-by-day basis, I merely totalled the number
of posts per person on each day (as listed in the archives) and noted that
all of these six individuals exceeded the daily posting limit on several
occasions.
8 violations -- 130 posts total -- Jeff Williams -- daily posts on days of
violation -- (9,6,6,7,6,6,7,10)
7 violations -- 102 posts total -- William Walsh -- daily posts on days of
violation -- (6,6,6,7,6,6,7)
4 violations -- 92 posts total -- Eric Dierker -- daily posts on days of
violation -- (7,8,10,6)
4 violations -- 69 posts total -- Jim Fleming -- daily posts on days of
violation -- (7,8,7,13)
3 violations -- 60 posts total -- Patrick Corliss -- daily posts on days of
violation -- (8,7,8)
2 violations -- 66 posts total -- Jefsey Morfin -- daily posts on days of
violation -- (8,6)
It is also reasonable to assume that a great many of the complaints forwarded
to ga-abuse concern individuals who post prolificly. If this is the case,
then it further becomes reasonable to conclude that excessive postings are a
major part of our problem with this list.
Let us consider what our list would have been like if these individuals were
on holiday during the last month. We would have received 502 posts from 56
people spread over 31 days (an average of one post per individual about every
3-4 days).
I have come to the conclusion that the needs of this Assembly might best be
served by further restricting the number of allowable daily postings in order
to cut down on the "noise". Perhaps a maximum of two posts per day per list
would be sensible, if vigorously enforced by our list monitors.
It is quite evident that we have a problem. I would appreciate your comments
on this possible solution.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|