[ga] Statement on Completion of "A Unique, Authoritative Root for the DNS" (ICP-3)

[DannyYounger@cs.com]

Milton Mueller's first comments on Stuart Lynn's revised draft, and the need 
for a working group:

Fellow Name Council members:

Whatever one's opinion of this document's substance, 
it is a completely illegitimate exercise. The staff has no 
authority to unilaterally declare that something is a policy. 

Policy in this matter is quite explicitly the purview of the 
DNSO, according to corporate articles and bylaws.

I would like to know on what basis ICANN staff decided to
completely bypass its own DNSO in drafting this so-called
policy.

This document was not even voted on by the ICANN Board. 

What makes this all the more egregious is that if ICANN
management had respect for its own processes, it would 
probably get something very like the same policy through
the DNSO. My own dissenting views are (probably) in the 
minority at this point. But apparently staff are so
fearful that its made-up policies cannot stand up to the
light of open discussion in a neutral forum that it has to
bypass any process at all.

Why are you afraid of open debate and discussion of this
issue in a working group? Do you lack confidence in the merit
of your ideas?

Milton Mueller

-------------------
Perhaps Milton can also elaborate on why the Names Council chose to reverse 
its decision and to declare this topic to be beyond the scope of the DNSO.  
Mr. Lynn's draft may be read at 
http://www.icann.org/icp/icp-3-background/lynn-statement-09jul01.htm

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html