Re[3]: [ga] a quote from Lynn

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Ouaf, ouaf,
when you are shown absurd, you don't like it.....
Ever read a DNS root file in your life? Tell us about the ". SOA" sequence....
I am enjoying all these serious people turning so poor theoricians once 
money is around... Most common in scientist and technical spheres however. 
Epistemology is full of those ...
Remembers me the TitaNIC architect...
Jefsey



On 17:58 11/07/01, William X. Walsh said:
>Hello Jefsey,
>
>Don't waste our mutual time anymore sending semantic crap like this to
>me.
>
>
>Wednesday, July 11, 2001, 8:56:13 AM, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
>
> > Much fun, WXW,
>
> > The Single Authoritative Root as you perfectly know is empty.
> > The dot at the rightest end that Jon Postel did not want
> > to see in the DN to avoid confusion in English but which is in
> > the DNS files.
>
> > Single and Authoritative means perfection. Only empty or divine.
> > Jon Postel though it empty. Joe Sims thinks it divine (cf. his
> > yesterday post: as if a lawyer's trick impressed a CPU :-) ).
>
> > So you perfectly know that the so-called roots are just the first
> > level of the DNS tree and technically not THE root. Someone
> > should have told it to Lynn.. So the inclusive roots are those
> > who try to accept everyone and the only excluding one - by
> > reason of money ($ 50.000 a piece to be read) - is the
> > AmerICANN root.
>
> > You also perfectly know that the AmerICANN root is quite
> > recent (is it even completed?) and is/will be 13 computers
> > managed by an open position (l Look at the AmerICANN
> > staff list).
>
> > Jefsey
>
>
>
>
> > On 01:19 11/07/01, William X. Walsh said:
> >>Hello L,
> >>
> >>Tuesday, July 10, 2001, 12:14:32 PM, L Gallegos wrote:
> >> > In actuality, Lynn's statement is good.  There should not be any
> >> > duplication, that's all.  It has nothing to do with whether you
> >> > choose one root over another.  When you want to go to nic.biz,
> >> > you should always get to the ARNI .biz registry, not Nuelevel.
> >> > When you want to go to computers.biz, you should always see the
> >> > same one.  That much should always be true.
> >>
> >> > What he is trying to say is that there should be only the USG root,
> >> > but he misses the point that there will always be more than one
> >> > root.  Universality is the uniqueness of the domain throughout all
> >> > roots.
> >>
> >>Under your position above, there is no reason for multiple roots, if
> >>they all contain the same data, there is no inherent benefit to
> >>multiple root systems.
> >>
> >>I have to say, this argument doesn't help your claims any, Leah.
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Best regards,
> >>William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> >>Userfriendly.com Domains
> >>The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> >>DNS Services from $1.65/mo
> >>
> >>--
> >>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> >>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> >>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> >>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>
>
>--
>Best regards,
>William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
>Userfriendly.com Domains
>The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
>DNS Services from $1.65/mo

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html