<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] MOTION - Moving Discussion Off the GA List
As an extremely long time member of this list in good standing I am taking
this opportunity to second this motion.
Kindest regards,
Bradley.
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Patrick Corliss wrote:
> The folowing motion has been proposed, seconded and amended.
>
> (1) The GA list should be reserved for substantive issues relating to DNS
> policy. All debate relating to rules, lists, protocols, procedures, etc.
> should be debated on GA-RULES. However, subscribers to GA-RULES may
> refer issues to the full GA for a determinative ballot or follow such other
> prescribed procedures that have been adopted by the General Assembly.
>
> (2) The list rules should be amended to include the exact wording of (1)
> above.
>
> As this motion has generated significant support, I would now ask that it
> be submitted to the DNSO Secretariat for a formal vote.
>
> Best regards
> Alternate Chair
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
Bradley D. Thornton
Chief Technology Officer
The PacificRoot/Joint Technologies Ltd.
http://www.PacificRoot.com
http://www.JointTech.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|