RE: Re[2]: [ga] Re: The First New.net Name Appraisal at Afternic

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

> From: William X. Walsh [mailto:william@userfriendly.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 3:26 AM
> 
> Hello Roeland,
> 
> Thursday, July 26, 2001, 2:18:26 AM, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> 
> >> From: DannyYounger@cs.com [mailto:DannyYounger@cs.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 6:44 PM
> 
> >> Letters between attorneys have already been published. We
> >> are potentially on the brink of a very ugly situation. 
> 
> > We are on the verge of name-war and fragmentation of the 
> Internet. This is
> > something that many of us have been trying to avoid for 
> over four years now.
> 
> The best way to avoid it is to not create alternative roots.

or ICANN can fold up it's tent and go home. Inclusive roots were there
before ICANN, unless you count IAHC as precursor to ICANN.

> The blame game can be played if you really want to, but it is much
> more likely to result in the alt.roots being blamed, and justifying
> the reason for a centralized authority ala ICANN.

Duh!... and your point is ...?
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html