Re: [ga] Letter from ICANN to New.net

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 07:43:37PM -0400, Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
> Kent Crispin wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 02:12:22PM -0700, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> 
> > > In it, New.net does not argue for multiple roots systems,
> >
> > What they argue really isn't very important -- they are so full of hype
> > you can't tell what they are talking about anyway.  What matters is what
> > they *do*, and they have *done* is create an alternate root.
> 
> Actually, it's more of an enhancement to the existing root... like an
> amplification, if you will.

You are just parroting hype.  The fact is that new.net has conflicting 
TLDs already.

>  The simple brute fact is that ICANN and the USG
> had not foreseen the inventive approach employed by new.net

Sorry, once again I'm afraid you don't know what you are talking about. 
There is nothing at all new in what new.net is doing. 

> to circumvent 
> the cartel-like conditions that were becoming increasingly evident through a
> growing number of blatant abuses of a *non-existent power...

"blatant abuse of a non-existent power"?

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html