<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Letter from ICANN to New.net
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Kent Crispin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 06:48:42PM -0700, William S. Lovell wrote:
> > A telling presumption exhibited here: if the "protocol community"
> > doesn't like something, ICANN should dump it.
>
> Yes. That is the same presumption you would use to say "if heart
> surgeons think a procdure is dangerous, dump it".
>
> > However, the
> > Internet does not exist for the benefit of the "protocol community"
> > or ICANN; those two entities exist for the benefit of Internet
> > users.
>
> Right. Medicine doesn't exist for the benefit of doctors. But if
> doctors tell us something is a bad idea, we generally listen. If we
> got practically universal agreement among doctors that a procedure was a
> bad idea, we should almost certainly dump it.
There was a time in history that the medical profession held leeches to be
the cure for almost every possible ailment known to man. :-)
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell
Earth is a single point of failure.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|