RE: [ga] Domain names as observed (was Tucows Response to Cochet tiTransfer Letter)

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

Hardly, I rarely throw things.  :-) And neither do you. So we seem both to
be safe.



-----Original Message-----
From: Joanna Lane [mailto:jo-uk@rcn.com]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 10:08 PM
To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
Cc: ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [ga] Domain names as observed (was Tucows Response to
Cochet tiTransfer Letter)


on 7/27/01 9:21 PM, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA at mcade@att.com wrote:

> Folks, I know I'll engage  much debate here, but I am under the impression
> that domain names are not "private property". I believe that's the present
> state of the law, but others who are lawyers can comment on that.
> 
> One registers and uses a domain name. That doesn't convey private property
> rights in the domain name.
> 
> I should duck, probably.
> 
> :-)
> 
> Marilyn

Is the ATT trademark private property? Do you not assume the same rights
have been conveyed in the att.com domain name?

(I should probably duck also)

Regards,
Joanna

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html