<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Domain names as observed (was Tucows Response to Cochetti Transfer Letter)
Sotiris, this is exactly what I was saying. It is not just a website
address, but the name of the company which is the source of goods
and services. For instance, I cannot trademark biztld.net because it is
just an address. If I were to form a company with that name, I could
register the trademark - maybe.
Leah
On 28 Jul 2001, at 2:51, Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
> L Gallegos wrote:
>
> > As for trademarking a domain name, in the US, it can't be unless it is
> > more than just the address for a website. The domain name itself, as a
> > domain name, is not trademarkable - at least according to the USPTO
> > guidelines.
>
> >From the USPTO:
>
> Word Mark: AMAZON.COM
>
> Goods & Services: IC 035. US 100 101 102. G & S: computerized on line
> search and ordering service featuring the wholesale and retail distribution
> of books, music, motion pictures, multimedia products and computer software
> in the form of printed books, audiocassettes, videocassettes, compact
> disks, floppy disks, CD ROMs, and direct digital transmission. FIRST USE:
> 19950415. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19950415
>
> Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING
>
> Serial Number: 75277670
>
> Filing Date: April 18, 1997
>
> Published for Opposition: March 31, 1998
>
> Registration Date: June 23, 1998
>
> This looks like a TM to me. (Also, not only is it a WORD MARK Tm, but it is
> of the most coomon TM variety: (1) TYPED DRAWING (1,729,236 occurences of
> this type of TM in the USPTO)
>
> IANAL,
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>
>
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|