<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Consumer/Registrant Protection Consitituency
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 23:32:16 -0700, "William S. Lovell"
<wsl@cerebalaw.com> wrote:
>I've seen you and Jefsey and Steven Heath (I think) and
>others wrestling over the name of the constituency, and
>again I see the alphabet soup a'cookin' on the stove. Why
>not KISS and just call it "Registrants?" That avoids the
>"consumers" problem, the question of whether a registrant
>is an owner or a holder, and a lot of others, methinks. :-)
I quite like this idea - solves a lot of problems.
As Joop said we could call it "Individual Registrants" or we could
just call it "Registrants" and specify in the fine print individuals
only.
DPF
--
david@farrar.com
ICQ 29964527
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|