RE: Protection from what? - Re: [ga] Consumer/Registrant Protecti on Consitituency

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

On 07:11 01/08/01, Roeland Meyer said:
>UDRP?

ICANN?
VeriSign?
US Government Safe Harbor messpolicy?
GIP (http://gip.org)?
Transfer mess?
.biz colliders?
NeuLevel lotteries?
ASO lack of vision?
WIPO?
ICP-3?
lacks in Judges education?
AntiCybersquatter Act?



> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Derek Conant [mailto:dconant@dnsga.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 6:51 AM
> > To: erica
> > Cc: Roeland Meyer; 'Joop Teernstra'; wsl@cerebalaw.com; Sotiris
> > Sotiropoulos; Roberto Gaetano; dannyyounger@cs.com; ga@dnso.org;
> > ga@dnsga.org
> > Subject: Protection from what? - Re: [ga] Consumer/Registrant
> > Protection
> > Consitituency
> >
> >
> > Where is there evidence that Consumer/Registrants need
> > protection?  Protection
> > when?  Protection from what?  Protection from whom?  A
> > consumer and registrant
> > can be both commercial and private.  This
> > Consumer/Registrants issue appears to
> > be an At-Large constituency matter.  Is this group proposing
> > a constituency just
> > to propose one?  Or, what?
> >
> > In an earlier post, I requested information concerning
> > Registrars engaged in
> > buying or selling expired domain names and other matters.
> > There are rumors that
> > Consumer/Registrants need protection, however, this concept
> > appears to be
> > motivated only by speculation and paranoia that have no merit.
> >
> > Derek Conant
> > DNSGA President and Chairman
> >
> > erica wrote:
> >
> > > Subject: RE: [ga] Consumer/Registrant Protection Consitituency
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > Or do you like to revisit my WG proposal to bring all
> > > > > Registrants together
> > > > > in one super-constituency?
> > > >
> > > > Since we're all in the same stew-pot ... why not?
> > >
> > > The best reason 'why not' is that, as far as I know, there
> > is no support for
> > > this from either the business or non-commercial
> > constituency.  The only way
> > > this could succeed, is with their support.
> > >
> > > erica
> > > > --
> > > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html