RE: [ga] The clock is ticking...

[k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)]

Yes, it raises questions, like:  why wasn't everyone invoiced at once?

~k

At 08:16 AM 8/3/2001 -0400, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>Danny,
>
>I am curious as to what your motivation would be in distributing these 
>partial comments without any context of the discussion in which they 
>occurred or the Budget Committee's action that resulted.
>
>Chuck
>-----Original Message-----
>From: DannyYounger@cs.com [mailto:DannyYounger@cs.com]
>Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 6:40 PM
>To: ga@dnso.org
>Subject: [ga] The clock is ticking...
>
>Roger Cochetti's comments to the Names Council Budget Committee list:
>
>Excerpt:  "If we conclude that the Council intended to apply these procedures
>for failures to pay 2001 and later dues, then my calculation is that three
>Constituencies will lose their voting privileges on August 18 (120 daysafter
>the April 18th date of the DNSO invoice to them):  the Business, the ccTLD,
>and the ISP Constituencies.  [ ICANN management did not invoice the
>Non-Commercial Constituency on April 19th, and does not seem to have invoiced
>them until July of 2001, in which case the clock for that Constituency would
>seem to have not started ticking until about three months later then the
>others.]
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-budget/Arc00/msg00474.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html