Re: [ga] NSI Supports Forcing All Domain Disputes to Virginia

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

At 11:25 PM +1200 3/8/01, Joop Teernstra wrote:
>At 13:24 2/08/2001 -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>>http://www.eff.org/Censorship/SLAPP/Forum_shopping/Heathmount_v_Technodome.com
>>
>>
>
>It will be a black day for the US Constitution if the Supreme Court would
>countenance such a subversion of defendant's rights to due process.
>Why on earth does Verisign want to get involved when they are not party to
>the dispute??

Maybe it was filed because their buddies that control ICANN asked them to?

-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html